PDF Download Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter
So, should you read it quickly? Naturally, yes! Need to you read this Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter as well as finish it fast? Not! You could get the delightful analysis when you are reading this publication while appreciating the leisure. Even you do not review the printed book as here, you could still hold your tablet and review it throughout. After obtaining the preference for you to obtain consisted of in this sort of versions, you can take some ways to read.
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter
PDF Download Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter
Residing in this new age will intend you to constantly take on others. One of the modal to complete is the idea, mind, as well as understanding consisted of experience that on by someone. To manage this condition, everybody must have much better knowledge, minds, and also assumed. It is to really feel competed with the others, of course in doing the kindness and this life to be much better. Among the ways that can be done is by analysis.
However right here, we will certainly not allow you to run out of guide. Every publication is conceived in soft file layout. With very same problems, individuals that run out the books in the shop will certainly like to this site as well as obtain the soft file of the book. As an example is this Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter As a new coming book that has terrific name in this world, you may really feel difficult to obtain it as yours. Therefore, we additionally provide its soft data right here.
After downloading and install the soft file of this Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter, you could begin to review it. Yeah, this is so enjoyable while somebody ought to review by taking their huge books; you are in your brand-new way by just handle your device. Or perhaps you are operating in the workplace; you can still use the computer to review Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter fully. Obviously, it will certainly not obligate you to take several pages. Just page by page depending upon the moment that you need to read Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter
To review Anti-Intellectualism In American Life, By Richard Hofstadter, you might refrain from doing complicated means. In this age, the supplied internet book is here. Visiting this web page comes to be the starter for you to locate this publication. Why? We offer this sort of publication in the listing, amongst the numerous book collections to discover. In this web page, you will certainly discover the web link of this publication to download. You could subsequent guide in that web link. So, when you actually require this book immediately, follow up just what we have actually informed for you below.
Review
"As Mr. Hofstadter unfolds the fascinating story, it is no crude battle of eggheads and fatheads. It is a rich, complex, shifting picture of the life of the mind in a society dominated by the ideal of practical success." --Robert Peel, Christian Science Monitor "The most comprehensive, succinct, and well-written one-volume treatment of the subject now available."--Walter Laqueur
Read more
From the Publisher
"The most comprehensive, succinct, and well-written one-volume treatment of the subject now available."--Walter Laqueur
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Paperback: 432 pages
Publisher: Vintage; 1st edition (February 12, 1966)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0394703170
ISBN-13: 978-0394703176
Product Dimensions:
5.2 x 1 x 8 inches
Shipping Weight: 13.6 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.4 out of 5 stars
116 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#103,764 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Professor Hofstadter sets the standard for the dissection of many facets of U.S. history. Here he tells the tale of the intertwining factors of American culture and politics that lead to prevalent anti-intellectualism. Although published in 1963, this remains the definitive work on the distrust of elites and experts and is sadly relevant to the present day. Hofstadter writes with a storyteller's style that does not skip or gloss over details but invites the reader to enjoy the experience of learning. He also often displays a wry sense of humor. If you want to understand why those most qualified to address issues -- whether they be foreign policy, law, running government, social sciences, etc. -- are often considered suspect sources of information while talking heads with no knowledge but loud voices are embraced, this book explains the framework for that culture. Personally, I found the writing so smooth and the subject so engrossing I could hardly take breaks between devouring the book.Hofstadter combines both painstaking detail and sweeping themes. I cannot imagine even the most learned people not learning new details about American history and the forces that have shaped our nation. Hofstadter's analysis is very persuasive -- analytical but with passion and new insights. Even events or people from American history that one knows about, one will be shown new perspectives. For example, one might not have considered how American democratic principles can encourage anti-intellectualism. Or how our economic system and intelligentsia themselves can sometimes encourage expertise and other times discourage it. It shouldn't need to be said that a Pulitzer Prize winning book is a must read, but I'll say it anyway.
Recent political development in this country, in which gossip, hearsay, "alternative facts," wishful thinking, invective, and shaming the intellectual class have become (again) coin of the realm at the highest levels of government all remind us that this is an enduring (though thankfully not always dominant) theme in our culture. Richard Hofstadter's 1964 masterwork thus points backward to the formation of these themes in American history, and points to the present and future with concern. People who worry about such things should definitely read this book, and the fact that it's now over 50 years old is of little consequence because of the way it helps us understand trends and events.
First, let me say what this book is not. It's not a book that can be understood only by deep and brilliant minds. The style is clear and readable, and anyone who can read and understand a newspaper editorial can understand what is said here. It's not a peevish rant about how everyone below a certain IQ level, or everyone of a certain political persuasion, or everyone who goes to church, must be mentally dull. The author goes out of his way to be fair and even-handed to all points of view, perhaps especially those with which he doesn't agree.Finally, even though it was published when John F. Kennedy was President, it is decidedly not out of date. In fact, anyone reading it will be amazed how the problems described here, from 50, 150, or even 200 years ago, may still crop up today.What is an intellectual? It is not necessarily someone with a genius-level IQ, or someone who speaks 5 languages, or even necessarily someone who discovers a new theory in physics.An intellectual is simply someone who takes the same pleasure in the exercise of his or her mind, in exploring ideas, as healthy and physically fit people do when they're out throwing a Frisbee or playing touch football. The pleasure is in the activity itself.Imagine a small child trying to see how many blocks she can stack up on top of each other before they fall. On the one hand, the child is playing--that is, doing something for no reason but that she enjoys it. On the other hand, she is perfectly serious and focused on her goal. If the stack of blocks falls down, she simply tries again.The intellectual is the person who shows this combination of play and seriousness towards ideas. To use the analogy of blocks again, the intellectual takes each block and turns it over to look at it from all sides, stacks the blocks up, arranges them in various shapes, and so forth.Of course this activity can have a serious purpose--e.g., thinking through the ethics of cloning--but to be a specifically intellectual pursuit, it must be done out of the love of the activity itself.America has often had a love-hate relationship with intellectualism, and still does today. Ironically, one of the ages that prized the intellect most was the Puritan era, because Puritans valued a learned ministry; after all, it was they who founded Harvard. Later, many of the Founding Fathers, such as Jefferson and Franklin, had wide intellectual interests, from philosophy, to science and the arts. Up to the middle of the 19th century, even many businessmen were cultured and well-educated--indeed, the goal of that day was to make one's fortune in trade and then retire at a relatively early age to a life of culture and philanthropy.Despite these notable periods of favor for the intellectual, it is equally true that something about American civilization has often worked against intellectualism. Part of it was that America, which began as pioneer settlements, always had to be very practical. Another aspect was the idea that cultured and educated elites were undemocratic--resentment of "the elites" didn't begin with today's Tea Party but was always an undercurrent of American life. A third aspect was that Americans tended to see the past as something dark and backward to be improved upon and then abandoned by American know-how and self-reliance.In politics, the Jeffersonian philosopher type went out with the age of Andrew Jackson. For the rest of the 19th century, intellectuals were mostly ineffectual reform types, criticizing from the sidelines, in magazine articles; they were not consulted in public life again until the turn of the 20th century. Their favor was high during the age of Wilson, perhaps even higher with Franklin D. Roosevelt's "Brain Trust," only to come under suspicion once more during the McCarthy era of the early 1950s.In business, the shift from trade to railroad building and, later, manufacturing, left the businessman less leisure for intellectual pursuits, nor was he particularly interested in having men work for him who were preoccupied with theory and speculation--enough education to read, write, and handle business math was satisfactory. In religion, the scholarly minister was replaced by the barely literate circuit rider, who rode the mountains and forests for miles to preach in log cabins to backwoods settlers. Later, it was felt that too much education might undermine religious faith, and we had the spectacle of the Scopes trial. Meanwhile, practical businessmen of that day didn't care to know about theological ideas so much as the idea of religion as a "power source" that could be turned on at will.Even literature and the arts suffered. America, unlike Europe, had no ruins of the Parthenon or medieval castles, nor did it have the same traditions of civilization. Artists and writers could certainly portray what they found here and did, but there was still a tension between merely celebrating this new land and achieving the critical distance with which the intellectual examines everything.Even education itself was not without its challenges. If you think that "the good old days" of education, when every child had 3 years of foreign language, 3 years of math, 3 years of science, and 2 years of U.S. history, lasted continuously until a couple of decades ago, read chapters 13 and 14 of this book, and they will startle you. In the name of progressive educational theories, traditional education underwent such radical changes beginning in 1910, culminating in the "life adjustment" movement of the 1940s and 1950s, that the U.S. Navy found that many of its World War II recruits required remedial math, and the president of Yale wrote, in 1954, about a high school graduate who seemed intelligent enough to attend Yale but whose high school transcript showed mostly electives in subjects like school choir, social adjustment, etc., with just a smattering of English, history, and the more traditional academic subjects.Hofstadter's final chapter addresses the tension between intellectuals who are willing to apply their knowledge and abilities to the service of institutions, including government and industry and those, on the other hand, who fear that they will "sell out" and be co-opted by conventional norms if they cooperate too much with society. Hofstadter was optimistic that it was possible for intellectuals to adopt a balanced outlook, cooperating with society and using their talents for its benefit, while always remaining independent-minded enough to apply their own original thinking to society's problems and not simply go along with the crowd.Hofstadter's untimely death from leukemia at 55, in 1970, certainly deprived America of one of her foremost thinkers. This book, one of about 6 major works that he wrote, is around 450 pages, arranged in chapters of about 30 pages apiece, with notes at the end of each chapter. I highly recommend it for anyone who wants to understand how the world's most advanced society can sometimes seem, at the same time, to contain knuckleheads and dunces--some, unfortunately, in positions of power. Again, this is not new--the only question is how we will respond and what kind of society we wish to have.
Hofstadter's characterization of Eisenhower has some kind of low brow anti-intellectual is not accurate. When Ike attended war college graduate school he was first in his class. It is true that Ike was a person of enormous practical accomplishmentin the roles he played in WWII, NATO, and as President, but he was not an anti-intellectual by any means. Many people who say his election as president over Adlai Stevenson as anti-intellectualism, but later changed their minds in retrospect. People like Arthur Schlesinger, Jr.The Korean War was halted shortly after Ike was inaugurated as President, after 3 years of conflict and stalemate. Ike avoided getting involved in Vietnam and Indochina, and Ike's tenure was generally marked by progress in Civil Rights,relative peace and prosperity. This is in contrast with the prior 8 years and the subsequent 8 years. America did not fight the disastrous Vietnam War during the time Eisenhower was President.We will never know how Stevenson would have done in these areas had he been elected President.
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter PDF
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter EPub
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter Doc
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter iBooks
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter rtf
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter Mobipocket
Anti-Intellectualism in American Life, by Richard Hofstadter Kindle
, by Terry Pratchett When obtaining Mort (Discworld), By Terry Pratchett as your analysis source, you may get the...){kind=link}
 Additionally, when you have the reading practice, it will lead you to keep as well...){kind=link}
